Industrial 3D Printing Services - MJF or SLS Which 3D Printing Technology is Better?
Let’s examine the SLS
and MJF 3D printing technology by breaking them down:
 |
| 3D Printing Service |
There are
different technologies that can be used to create a 3D printed model. In the
prototyping stage alone, we have multiple technologies to choose from, each
with its own unique set of benefits and drawbacks. In the AMUSE firm have two
of the most popular technologies in use today are MJF and SLS industrial 3D printing services in chennai. Both are reliable, industrial-grade 3D printing
technologies that can produce high-quality prototypes and end use-parts.
Before we begin we must understand PBF, Powder bed fusion or PBF is a type of additive manufacturing technique that involves layer-by-layer fusion of atomized polymer powder particles to create the desired parts. The technologies that deploy Powder bed fusion are Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Selective Laser Melting (SLM), Multi Jet Fusion (MJF), Electron Beam Melting (EBM).
Powder bed fusion applications are ideal for producing end-use parts in industries such as automotive, aerospace, and many others.
We all believe the manufactured parts of SLS and MJF are mostly the same. But there are some distinguishing features that one technology is preferred over other.
In this article, we will explore and analyse SLS and MJF. so get your
microscopes out and get ready. Let's examine them.
SLS:
Selective laser sintering is a powder bed 3D printing services in the technology which uses energy from the laser to selectively melt powdered nylon material by fusing them into the desired part. SLS materials is worked upon by a CO2 laser which scans each cross section to sinter the thin layer of powder over the build platform. Later, the process is repeated until the build is completed.
Selective laser sintering is a powder bed 3D printing services in the technology which uses energy from the laser to selectively melt powdered nylon material by fusing them into the desired part. SLS materials is worked upon by a CO2 laser which scans each cross section to sinter the thin layer of powder over the build platform. Later, the process is repeated until the build is completed.
MJF:
Multi-jet fusion is a type of powder bed printing technology which uses ink as a fusing agent along with an infrared energy source (which is passed over inked areas to fuse the material). MJF is a combination of SLS and material jetting technologies.
MJF material is worked upon by heating a thin layer of powder around the sintering temperature and then passing it over a carriage inkjet nozzle. Simultaneously, 3D printing agents for inhibiting sintering near the edge parts.
Multi-jet fusion is a type of powder bed printing technology which uses ink as a fusing agent along with an infrared energy source (which is passed over inked areas to fuse the material). MJF is a combination of SLS and material jetting technologies.
MJF material is worked upon by heating a thin layer of powder around the sintering temperature and then passing it over a carriage inkjet nozzle. Simultaneously, 3D printing agents for inhibiting sintering near the edge parts.
The SLS vs MJF Analysis:Let’s put them into a comparison analysis match.
Strength:
Even if both MJF and SLS use the same material (Nylon), the manufactured parts from MJF are stronger than SLS because it has better strength, flexibility and homogeneity.
Even if both MJF and SLS use the same material (Nylon), the manufactured parts from MJF are stronger than SLS because it has better strength, flexibility and homogeneity.
Mechanical Properties:
The manufactured parts from MJF show a better uniform and symmetrical and isotropic mechanical properties through the parts than SLS.
Cost:
Cost-effectiveness depends upon the purpose. For bulk production parts, SLS is effective. For manufacturing single-piece components, MJF is cheaper. Production speed is extremely high than SLS. Thus, for continuous production option MJF is always found to cost efficient.
Accuracy:
It is a tie. Both MJF and SLS have similar kinds of accuracy.
Material and Colour Shades:
SLS has a better edge here. Since it offers a variety of materials along with different shades. MJF has a limited range.
Quantity:
MJF wins this easily because it takes less manufacturing time than SLS due to its work process. So, you can manufacture a lot in less time.
Heat Source:
SLS uses a laser as its heat source to fuse materials while MJF uses an inkjet carrier to fuse materials.
Appearance: Again it's a tie. Visually, both MJF and SLS have similar appearances.
So, Who is the Winner?
Cost-effectiveness depends upon the purpose. For bulk production parts, SLS is effective. For manufacturing single-piece components, MJF is cheaper. Production speed is extremely high than SLS. Thus, for continuous production option MJF is always found to cost efficient.
Accuracy:
It is a tie. Both MJF and SLS have similar kinds of accuracy.
Material and Colour Shades:
SLS has a better edge here. Since it offers a variety of materials along with different shades. MJF has a limited range.
Quantity:
MJF wins this easily because it takes less manufacturing time than SLS due to its work process. So, you can manufacture a lot in less time.
Heat Source:
SLS uses a laser as its heat source to fuse materials while MJF uses an inkjet carrier to fuse materials.
Appearance: Again it's a tie. Visually, both MJF and SLS have similar appearances.
For a unique combination of material properties, MJF is the
best by altering the concentration of different materials which in turn changes
the mechanical and
chemical
properties of the material.
On the other hand, SLS can only manufacture materials from a
single base material.Which is the best? It depends on the purpose of the
material. Both have their unique uses.
For More Informations, Visit : AMUSE
And Details, Visit : 3D
Printing Services
Comments